Coquette Core & Hyperfemininity

If you’re like me and have the unfortunate tendency to be chronically online, you’re more than familiar with Coquette Core and the slew of newly coined ‘girly’ aesthetics i.e. the strawberry girl, tomato girl, blueberry girl, cinnamon girl, vanilla girl, hot girl (shout out Megan Thee Stallion), rat girl ( I don't know what this one means either), clean girl, soft girl… and I think that about covers it?

Though I do not tend to fit easily into archetypes, except for my Art Hoe phase back in High School (I regret nothing)—the recent emergence of Coquette Core is one I’ve found to be somewhat fun & refreshing.

Taking inspiration from ballet culture, the romantic period, and media’s favorite femme fatales, the Coquette Core aesthetic is characterized by a playful, charismatic, and “flirty” attitude (this is pretty much its most agreed upon definition according to Who What Wear ). Those invested in the aesthetic tend to adopt feminine silhouettes, lots of lace, tulle/ sheer fabrics, pearls, and ribbons as a staple.

Essentially, if you’re a Simone Rocha, Sandy Liang, Miu Miu, or Margiela enthusiast, you’re likely already well-versed in all this. 

Though by no means perfect (it has its flaws) Coquette Core first piqued my interest because it aimed to be a ‘reclamation’ of femininity — a means to find strength in the disparaged and power in the frills where the patriarchy found frailty. Lately, however, I’ve become much more fascinated with the fact that despite foregrounding traditional femininity, Coquette Core has somehow managed to evolve into a lighthearted trend on social media, where people, regardless of identity, participate in the “girly” aesthetic.

Renee Rap’s Instagram Story December 20th, 2023

@veryharryhill on X December 19, 2023

The tweets and memes pictured above have by far been some of my favorite examples of Coquette Core’s cultural expansion. As a black girl, seeing other women of my complexion take on the style has also brought me lots of joy while simultaneously causing some feelings of instability with femininity to resurface. 

In a lot of ways, I’d like to think that the true insidiousness of racism is the unobserved mode by which it successfully prevents black people from self-expression, fragmenting our identities in their very early stages.

At a very young age, as a little black girl, I learned that the soft traditional femininity that Coquette Core exemplifies wasn’t available to me in the same way that it was for other girls. Notably those fairer than I. I could dress the part of a “girl” and have the “toys” and “girly interests,” yet there was something about me—my features, my hair, and my complexionthat became a crippling reminder that I was once again an other. For black girls and women alike, dark-skinned ones especially, being robbed of femininity is one way that white supremacy strives to dehumanize us. 

Truth is, though I may have loved the bows and barrettes my mom put in my hair as a kid and the frilly socks and mary-janes in which she dressed me— words like dainty, graceful, delicate, and pretty still felt out of reach. With time, I came to understand that my identity as a black woman is and has always been socially tethered to masculinity as opposed to feminity due to adopted white supremacist beliefs. It is difficult to identify a point in American history when black women were not relegated to stereotypical ‘male’ roles and overly criticized for possessing “unattractive” domineering male behaviors. It often feels that to be perceived as feminine, we have to occupy extremes, oversexualizing, overextending, and overperforming. Otherwise, we relinquish our femininity altogether.

That’s all to say that part of the reason I think I enjoyed the Art Hoe aesthetic so much in high school (before it got co-opted by a much larger & whiter demographic) was because it allowed black girls to be seen in a way that social media, let alone the real-world, had never before. As clichéd as it may sound, we could be expressive, artistic, awkward, goofy, cute, and quirky, superimposing ourselves into European impressionist paintings to physically make and take up space. Suddenly, it seemed like femininity wasn’t something I needed to labor for. I was no longer making desperate attempts to cling to or mend my bastardized ‘womanhood.’

As a teenage girl, still unsure of herself and her changing body, who had only begun to deal with the heft of perception (that damming concept), embodying the Art Hoe made me feel I could enjoy my black girlhood in ways that I had felt so isolated from beforehand. 

So, how exactly does this all relate to Coquette Core?

Although fashion and beauty trends should NOT solely define girlhood—that view is overly simplistic and reductive—these trends are still vital for self-expression.

Don't get me wrong, I too found it a bit jarring that I enjoyed an aesthetic that draws from industries like ballet, which have lengthy histories of being palpably white, harsh, and exclusive. However, in light of its flaws, it's clear that coquette core has opened up a space on social media for us to participate in progressive discourse on race, sex, gender, and sexuality.

While there are so many thoughts left to flesh out, I can confidently say that this era within which Coquette Core and other hyper-feminine aesthetics are evolving has at least confirmed for me that my femininity is deeply bound to my personhood in ways that I am still trying to decipher.

Coquette core and other hyper-feminine aesthetics have also reminded me of the importance of having an outlet—such as style—to navigate the complexities of defining oneself, especially at a young age. Karon Davis’ exhibition at Salon 94, "Beauty Must Suffer," a photo from which you will find as the cover for this article, is the most beautiful representation of how I’ve begun to think about Coquette Core, blackness, and femininity: her work both affirms delicate black femininity while demonstrating the onerous labor it takes to cultivate it in the first place.

Some readers may think I have been too generous to Coquette Core, and that may be true. However, I want to clarify that this article is not intended to gloss over the aesthetic’s shortcomings. Like all fashion trends, Coquette Core needs to become more inclusive on all fronts.

I guess I decided to write this article because I believe that Coquette Core when emulated by those of us who feel like an other, goes deeper than just a shallow, one-dimensional approach to femininity. After all, no one works harder than a black ballerina. I’m sure Misty Copeland would agree.


Cover photo from ‘Karon Davis: Beauty Must Suffer’ @ Salon 94

That's why you think it's beautiful.

It’s aesthetically pleasing to look at, isn’t it? Accurate, symmetric architecture; attractive faces of celebrities; perfect, powerful nature (disregard that it’s a hurricane…)

Parthenon, Greece

Image via

A hurricane from space

Image via

Amber Heard, American actress

Image via

Taj Mahal, the jewel of India

Image via

While you may not be attracted by these exact pictures, there are definitely some which you like but cannot explain why.

Well, I can. With some maths help.

Simple is beautiful

There is actually a reason why we prefer certain shapes, human appearances, and visual objects in general. And it is not subjective.

There exists golden ratio (golden section, golden mean, divine proportion) in nature, which is the proportion between the length and width of the object, encircled by a rectangle, equalling 1:1.618 - a magical number Phi. The nature always seeks to achieve golden ratio, and every time it does, it immensely pleases our eyes!

… but why?

We can ask for the explanation from the professor of mechanical engineering at Duke University, Adrian Bejan, who notes that, evolutionarily, it’s easier for animals (humans including) to perceive the image scanning it from side to side, not up and down. I believe that is because we observe more space horizontally, and not vertically.

So in the golden ratio, the length is 1.168 times as long as the width, which means that it is easier for our eyes to perceive, and they are naturally attracted to these correctly-geometrically constructed beautiful figures. And, according to the professor, simple is beautiful:

This is the best flowing configuration for images from plane to brain. When we see the proportions in the golden ratio, we are helped. We feel pleasure and we call it beauty.
— Adrian Bejan

How the rule actually works

Here you can see that these objects actually follow the golden ratio.

The ratio between the long and short lines is 1:1.168 (as golden as the colour of the building!)

(never mind that I have a better proof below - I simply attached this picture because it matches the colour scheme of my article - in the end, we are discussing visual aesthetics here!)

Image via

And here is a more mathematical proof of the golden ratio of the building - looks convincing, doesn’t it?

a = 1.168b

Image via

Golden ratio with a golden spiral (which expands by a factor of magical Phi).

Image via

Even two golden spirals.

Image via

The human body also seeks perfection.

Yes, there is a reason for why our arms dangles weirdly beneath our pelvis when we stand still, and why our noses are bigger than our eyes.

That being said, the human body is perfect — it follows the golden ratio.

Image via

Image via

Are celebrities (those who are praised for their appearance) even more perfect?

Well, we can measure it. The Golden Ratio of Beauty Phi determines how close to “perfect” one’s appearance is:

Bella Hadid is 94.35% physically perfect according to the Beauty Phi.

Image via

Beyoncé is honoured to have one of the most beautiful faces, as well.

Image via

So a simple Sherlock’s deduction would be that golden ratio explains why literally the whole world may go crazy about one person’s appearance.

But Watson, we have a problem!

… which is me wondering if it’s a simple coincidence that the most “perfect” faces belong to famous celebrities?

I reckon not. The Greek golden ratio is known for long, and by many. And their surgeon is definitely one of that many:

Hadid’s plastic surgery to achieve golden ratio It’s like being an architect of your face.

Image via

So my takeaway:

Surgery can make people look perfect, but only nature can make people be perfect.

Moreover, some claim that golden ratio has nothing to do with beauty. For instance, John Allen Paulos, a research mathematician at Temple University, argues:

There’s no evidence for most of these claims. It’s a common rectangle.
— John Allen Paulos

Which I find quite plausible, considering that you cannot find tons of images (be it of people or architecture) with golden ratio, meaning that, maybe, someone just looks for fun drawing challenges and draws spirals and rectangles over people’s faces.

Nevertheless, we can definitely call the golden ratio a “driver” of our eyes: sometimes we arrive at unexpected destinations, or have a weirdly long lay-over somewhere.

But drivers also sleep, and that is when, I believe, the time comes for our subjective visual preferences.

For instance, I know that you think that Reg is ugly. I know it doesn’t follow the golden ratio.

But I. Can’t. Help. Falling in love. With. It.


Featured image via